Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Cardiff 401A?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
