Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
