Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX and Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
