Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 800X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and ball bearings (8). While Daiwa TANACOM 800X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
