Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
