Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX
