Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.53 out of 10) and total score (8.55 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X
