Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
