Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and total score (8.49 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
