Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in . If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Solid value at €32.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
