Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
94.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €379.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 20 Luvias LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
