Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano TLD II A
Multireels
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.5:1 / 1.4:1
Maximum drag42kg / 92.59lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €285.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II LRSA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, while Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano TLD II A?
Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.07 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
