Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
