Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX and Shimano Tyrnos 30 II perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 30 II stands out for a ball bearings of 4 ARB. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Shimano Tyrnos 30 II?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
