Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

78.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.63 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Ultegra

Spinning

92.50 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €132.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000HGD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Ultegra?

Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX

8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.