Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
