Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX and Shimano Tiagra 130AX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Tiagra 130AX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa BG 4500X
