Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX and Shimano Tyrnos 30 II perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 30 II stands out for a ball bearings of 4 ARB. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Tyrnos 30 II?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
