Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
