Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
