Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G)
Spinning
91.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
