Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI

Spinning

68.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.86 out of 10

Ergonomics6.15 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight255g / 8.99oz

Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €41.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the total score (8.27 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.