Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

74.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.2 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight240g / 8.47oz

Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500HGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.