Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
