Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (265g / 9,35oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X
