Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
