Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

84.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €195.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn 2020 Clash II

Spinning

67.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.59 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch

Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €177.40
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.59 out of 10 and a weight of 200g / 7,05oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Penn 2020 Clash II?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency