Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
