Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.88 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
