Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

78.80 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.43 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight170g / 6oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €151.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €65.70
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn FIERCE IV?

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X

7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques