Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
85.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.5:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight3265g / 115.17oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €779.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX and Shimano Tiagra 80WAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX offers a weight of 170g / 6oz, while Shimano Tiagra 80WAX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX
