Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

79.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT

Spinning

65.40 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.15 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight255g / 8.99oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €75.30
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.53 out of 10) and the total score (7.9 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX

6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques