Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
