Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €209.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a durability of 8.53 out of 10, while Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
- With a fast retrieve 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX
