Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
85.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.5:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight3265g / 115.17oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €779.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano Tiagra 80WAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, while Shimano Tiagra 80WAX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 50X
