Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX stands out for a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
