Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (8.53 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
