Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) and durability (8.53 out of 10). While Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
