Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Daiwa TANACOM 800X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 800X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
