Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
