Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX and Daiwa Tanacom 750 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX offers a gear ratio of 5.8:1, while Daiwa Tanacom 750 stands out for a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Tanacom 750?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
