Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and durability (8.53 out of 10). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
