Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X
