Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX and Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX offers a gear ratio of 5.8:1, while Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
