Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX offers a weight of 195g / 6,88oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
