Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
