Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Feeder And Match
51.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/230
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (8.54 out of 10). While Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
