Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.31 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
