Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.54 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
