Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX and Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
